MBA@Fudan
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

First Point of Discussion

+48
Jasmine Yu
Lin Li 2013 GA
WANG Yingying
2013GA Yao Ya fang
vivianwang
gordon.guo
Vivian Yu
Liu Xin
David Dong
Rick_Feng
Chris_Ge#2013960364
Tony项童
colourfulcloud
XIN TAI
Celia MEI
Dr. Ali
anne_songwei
Xiuqiang ZHANG
Sean Chen
2013960417_Leo Li
Karen Han2013960144
Qingshan
Sa
lucyzheng
Jiehui Diao
Kenny.han 201325708154
youthia
Alexis YANG(2013960273)
bao_vincent (2013960302)
xiaoxia
Yvonne Biyun Yang
wanglei
Wang Quan(2013960560)
Sarah Xiao
Ryan_Du
ShiJun_2013960510
Vera Zhu
qianleon
Wang Cheng_GA_2013960546
2013960558
Meiling
Feng Chaoyu
YuanStan
viewland
Cynthialjz
2013960340
2013GA WU WEI
Admin
52 posters

Page 2 of 4 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Go down

First Point of Discussion  - Page 3 Empty Re: First Point of Discussion

Post by lucyzheng Thu Sep 05, 2013 9:40 am

[quote="Dr. Ali"]No offense.

On the one hand, GB is more inclusive than GA. Students like you always come here to gain fantastic ideas.
On the other hand, perhaps GB is too busy to post theory like an armchair strategist.

Don't be restricted to 'Class'. That's also a kind of creativity.

Can't agree more:) Ali, your photo is very cute~
lucyzheng
lucyzheng

Posts : 9
Join date : 2013-09-04
Location : SH

Back to top Go down

First Point of Discussion  - Page 3 Empty Re: First Point of Discussion

Post by lucyzheng Thu Sep 05, 2013 10:06 am

Following Dr. Ali's question, how to let China be more creative in current status?

Simply throw some personal views.

From country perspective,

1. Play a more active role involving international affairs.
2. Open policy to welcome more talents and type of business, eg. Trial of free trade zones.
...
From company perspective,
1. Talent development: encourge internal transfer or buying talents from different industries, which may burst to more creative ideas and even transform an industry model.
2. Benchmark: My company Ford is reserved in some way of culture.Many systems are soley developed in its global oraganiztion in Ford's way rather than benchmarking most leading approach in the world. Making changes means consuming time, energy, traning resources, smart failure, etc. But more recently we see a combination of technology with Autos. SYNC, a technology we customers can use mobile to control and master your car is such a cool thing.

From personal persctive,
I look forward more discussion and knowledge exchange on and off class.

LUCY ZHENG
2013GA
2013960118
lucyzheng
lucyzheng

Posts : 9
Join date : 2013-09-04
Location : SH

Back to top Go down

First Point of Discussion  - Page 3 Empty Re: First Point of Discussion

Post by lucyzheng Thu Sep 05, 2013 10:16 am

one thing to add, know some mechanism or process of change management, may help us to think differently. Define, dignoze, design and deliver..
lucyzheng
lucyzheng

Posts : 9
Join date : 2013-09-04
Location : SH

Back to top Go down

First Point of Discussion  - Page 3 Empty Re: First Point of Discussion

Post by 2013960417_Leo Li Thu Sep 05, 2013 10:19 am

From company perspective,maybe more important thing is about the culture and the management style. Create a learning organization with inclusiveness and effective communication culture is the most critical element to win the competition in the 21st century, which can drive everybody within the organization to work creatively and enjoy the process. I'll try to write a summery from a single company perspective later when I'm free...

Cheers~


lucyzheng wrote:Following Dr. Ali's question, how to let China be more creative in current status?

Simply throw some personal views.

From country perspective,

1. Play a more active role involving international affairs.
2. Open policy to welcome more talents and type of business, eg. Trial of free trade zones.
...
From company perspective,
1. Talent development: encourge internal transfer or buying talents from different industries, which may burst to more creative ideas and even transform an industry model.
2. Benchmark: My company Ford is reserved in some way of culture.Many systems are soley developed in its global oraganiztion in Ford's way rather than benchmarking most leading approach in the world. Making changes means consuming time, energy, traning resources, smart failure, etc. But more recently we see a combination of technology with Autos. SYNC, a technology we customers can use mobile to control and master your car is such a cool thing.

From personal persctive,
I look forward more discussion and knowledge exchange on and off class.

LUCY ZHENG
2013GA
2013960118
2013960417_Leo Li
2013960417_Leo Li

Posts : 6
Join date : 2013-09-05
Age : 46

Back to top Go down

First Point of Discussion  - Page 3 Empty Re: First Point of Discussion

Post by 2013960417_Leo Li Thu Sep 05, 2013 10:20 am

Totally agree this point, ding~

lucyzheng wrote:one thing to add, know some mechanism or process of change management, may help us to think differently. Define, dignoze, design and deliver..
2013960417_Leo Li
2013960417_Leo Li

Posts : 6
Join date : 2013-09-05
Age : 46

Back to top Go down

First Point of Discussion  - Page 3 Empty Re: First Point of Discussion

Post by Ryan_Du Thu Sep 05, 2013 10:36 am

China is a huge market. It is easy to make money by copycat, people do not have to be creative. The majority of people will lost the motivation for innovation.  In the contrast, when we look at our neighbour Japan, small market where the competition is fierce,the company must be creative, or they will be phase out.

By GA Du Zeng Ya 2013968483.

Ryan_Du

Posts : 2
Join date : 2013-09-04

Back to top Go down

First Point of Discussion  - Page 3 Empty Re: First Point of Discussion

Post by Celia MEI Thu Sep 05, 2013 11:45 am

I think about a Chinese proverb "impasse is followed by change". The innovation is about time on the market.

When the market is quickly developping and there is still a huge gap between westen business model or technical, the first action is to chase the trends. When market becomes competitive and mature, the situation will force people or company to find a new way or try in new field.

The culture impact, history problem, government policy could be the factors of barriers, but the innovation is never leaded or created by these reasons. The innovation usually happens when we look at the actual market and try to complete or even create the needs of customers.

2013 GA MEI QI 2013968586
Miaomiao


Last edited by Celia MEI on Sun Sep 08, 2013 4:33 pm; edited 1 time in total

Celia MEI

Posts : 4
Join date : 2013-09-04
Location : Shanghai

Back to top Go down

First Point of Discussion  - Page 3 Empty Re: First Point of Discussion

Post by XIN TAI Thu Sep 05, 2013 1:00 pm

I think the barrier between financial industry and creative industries is a big challenge for the creative industries enterprises to survive and prosper.  

Comparing to traditional industries, creative industries including advertising, art, fashion, R&D, video games, performing art … are hard to get investment. Both banks and VCs are very prudent of investing the new developed culture creative enterprises, for the reason that most creative industry enterprises are small or middle size enterprises with limited tangible assets. The creative industries mainly take intellectual investment, and its assets are intangible, like copyright, intellectual property right and etc.


Facing to this challenge one possibility for creative industries enterprises is to seek the support of related departments of the state. In Shanghai, technology companies can apply for the certification of high and new tech enterprise. With this certification, the enterprise can get Science and Technology Commission’s guarantee to get loan from the banks and or increase the loan limit. But more important thing I think is that the creative industries enterprises need to develop effective profit model and channel for products of creative industries, mostly culture products. SNDA free internet game is a very successful case.

TAI XIN
2013960077

XIN TAI

Posts : 1
Join date : 2013-09-05

Back to top Go down

First Point of Discussion  - Page 3 Empty Re: First Point of Discussion

Post by Celia MEI Thu Sep 05, 2013 1:19 pm

The idea inspires me a lot.  So the barrier may not be the environment, but be the model we create. If there is an internal engine of effective profit model, no reason to have barrier again.
 
Thanks for sharing~
 
 
XIN TAI wrote:I think the barrier between financial industry and creative industries is a big challenge for the creative industries enterprises to survive and prosper.  

Comparing to traditional industries, creative industries including advertising, art, fashion, R&D, video games, performing art … are hard to get investment. Both banks and VCs are very prudent of investing the new developed culture creative enterprises, for the reason that most creative industry enterprises are small or middle size enterprises with limited tangible assets. The creative industries mainly take intellectual investment, and its assets are intangible, like copyright, intellectual property right and etc.


Facing to this challenge one possibility for creative industries enterprises is to seek the support of related departments of the state. In Shanghai, technology companies can apply for the certification of high and new tech enterprise. With this certification, the enterprise can get Science and Technology Commission’s guarantee to get loan from the banks and or increase the loan limit. But more important thing I think is that the creative industries enterprises need to develop effective profit model and channel for products of creative industries, mostly culture products. SNDA free internet game is a very successful case.

TAI XIN
2013960077

Celia MEI

Posts : 4
Join date : 2013-09-04
Location : Shanghai

Back to top Go down

First Point of Discussion  - Page 3 Empty Re: First Point of Discussion

Post by colourfulcloud Thu Sep 05, 2013 5:11 pm

The first come up to my mind is people's mindset .people haven't realized the importance of creative thinking and the great financial profit that creative industry can bring. China still relies heavily on manufacturering industry with mass production of products with similar features, and OEM accounts for a lot percentage in the industry. These enterprisers tend to be producers only, rather than being an inventor. Nowadays, 3D printing has already been a hot topic almost all over the world, but still some traditional manufacturers cannot accept it, and don't take it as a revolutionary invention; instead , they would rather use the traditional machines.

Another barrier is the lack of creative ability and some companies' habits of copying and mimicking In China,we can hardly have companies like Apple, or Google, and there is hardly any epoch-making product like IPhone or IPad. Xiaomi phone might possibly be the iphone in China, but still most manufacturers tend to imitate these hits, rather than investing on R&D to create a brand new product or function.

A problem has to be raises is education. In China, since kindergarten to university, students have long received cramming method of teaching, and have been taught to recite textbooks and standard answers, without learning how to have their own original thinking and express own ideas. Thus, we are lack of creative talents to join in and make contributions to the creative industry.

Shirley Xuan
Student ID: 2013968720

colourfulcloud

Posts : 1
Join date : 2013-09-05

Back to top Go down

First Point of Discussion  - Page 3 Empty Re: First Point of Discussion

Post by 2013GA WU WEI Thu Sep 05, 2013 5:27 pm

XIN TAI wrote:I think the barrier between financial industry and creative industries is a big challenge for the creative industries enterprises to survive and prosper.  

Comparing to traditional industries, creative industries including advertising, art, fashion, R&D, video games, performing art … are hard to get investment. Both banks and VCs are very prudent of investing the new developed culture creative enterprises, for the reason that most creative industry enterprises are small or middle size enterprises with limited tangible assets. The creative industries mainly take intellectual investment, and its assets are intangible, like copyright, intellectual property right and etc.


Facing to this challenge one possibility for creative industries enterprises is to seek the support of related departments of the state. In Shanghai, technology companies can apply for the certification of high and new tech enterprise. With this certification, the enterprise can get Science and Technology Commission’s guarantee to get loan from the banks and or increase the loan limit. But more important thing I think is that the creative industries enterprises need to develop effective profit model and channel for products of creative industries, mostly culture products. SNDA free internet game is a very successful case.

TAI XIN
2013960077
Fully agree. Actually this barrier exists everywhere and all countries are bothered with it. If Chinese government can find an effective way to support nascent companies in creative industries to survive. That's the creativity.

2013GA Wu Wei 2013960247

2013GA WU WEI

Posts : 7
Join date : 2013-09-04

Back to top Go down

First Point of Discussion  - Page 3 Empty Re: First Point of Discussion

Post by Tony项童 Thu Sep 05, 2013 6:17 pm

Admin wrote:Future economic development of China depends on its ability to develop its creative industries. Discuss the barriers and challenges facing such transformation.

Well, I give my brief thoughts on this issue.
In my opinion,there two main challenges we are facing, examination-oriented education system and lack of cultivation mechanism.
Rich talent with creativity is the most crucial factor for creative industries. But the bad news is students in mainland of china are supposed to be lack of creativity, because examination-oriented education system have killed their creative ability as children grow up. I think we do must uproot the bad education system the children are still enduring now, build new educational system to encourage and cultivate students’ creative essential.
The creative industries needs good cultivation mechanism. Excellent creative companies need enough fund,mature managerial mechanism, profit-sharing mechanism besides creative talent when they are on the successful road. Now we don’t have strong mechanism to support our potential companies. But the good news is some entrepreneurs already have went in for this job, such as Li Kaifu and his Innovation Works. His firm has devoted in helping many young creative companies blossom through teaching these companies how to build good managerial environment, how to choose correct direction for development, how to obtain enough capital from investors. I think we need more such kind of companies.
Smile 

2013GA Xiang Tong 2013960572
Tony项童
Tony项童

Posts : 1
Join date : 2013-09-04
Age : 105

Back to top Go down

First Point of Discussion  - Page 3 Empty Re: First Point of Discussion

Post by Chris_Ge#2013960364 Thu Sep 05, 2013 6:40 pm

When it comes to some barriers in our economic development or transformation, the first concern flashed upon my mind is,

--Mitigate excessive administrative interfere in market economy--

Although the past 30+ years reforming and opening has witnessed China’s great achievement in economic development, it seems that our political reforms lag behind and fail to keep pace with it.

Our market economy, deriving and changing from original planned economy, was born with some distinct Chinese characteristics, which is determined that our governmental functions played an important role at the beginning of economic development. And now, after developing and cumulating in recent decade of years, it has ability to generate natural force to guide the market capitalism through its own competitive mechanism. Government should pay more attention and spare more room to focus on macro- economic control, such as fiscal policy and monetary policy, acting as a qualified visible hand in this market.

Unfortunately, today we still find plenty of administrative regulations and provisions flood in our commercial field, even restricting some normal business behavior. It is supposed to become kind of bottleneck in our further economic development somehow. As a result, transformation of a public service-oriented government is absolutely indispensable.
(TBC)

Chris GE# GA 2013960364

Chris_Ge#2013960364

Posts : 3
Join date : 2013-09-05

Back to top Go down

First Point of Discussion  - Page 3 Empty Re: First Point of Discussion

Post by Rick_Feng Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:28 pm

In my opinion, the barriers to develop creative industries in China are lack of the fair and transparent commercial environment for SMEs (small and medium-sized enterprises), and lack of the protection of the outcome of creative companies .

Creative industries are high risk industries, of course, also with high returns, and the development of creative industries are related to the development of those SMEs in creative industries. But in China government and state-owned enterprises control most economics resources , and this put many SMEs in very disadvantage position when they need compete or negotiate with those big companies , moreover, SMEs are also difficult to get finance support from banks compared to those big state-owned companies .

In addition, lack of the protection of the outcome of creative companies also makes those SMEs with good potential lose the chance to become a great company. Finally, it will be barriers to develop creative industries .

The challenges to develop creative industries are how to change people’s mindset, and inspire more people and companies to invest and join creative industries.

After 30 years rapid economic development, China becomes 2nd largest economic entity in the world. Many people accumulate huge wealth in recent years, and these stories are inspiring more people to chase their dream of fortune and want to achieve this goal by fast track; Many companies also prefer follower strategy and invest in manufacture industry instead of creative industry, so China becomes the world factory. I should say that the strategy works very well in past years (the situation is very likely to what happens in the early of 1960s in Japan ) , but as China economics develops and the cost of labor becomes higher and higher , it is time to change the way we think - the development of creative industries will benefit China economics in long term and bring better profit for companies .

In addition, currently education systems in China doesn’t inspire youth for creative thinking . The education focus too much on the result (how much knowledge student learns ) instead of the progress (how to learn and think ) , so the education might limit youth’s mindset of creative thinking .

In sum , the development of creative industries is very important to China future economic . Although China faces some barriers and challenges to develop its creative industries, but if we can overcome those difficulties , it will benefit China economics in long term .

2013GA
Feng Zhenyu
2013960027

Rick_Feng

Posts : 1
Join date : 2013-09-05

Back to top Go down

First Point of Discussion  - Page 3 Empty Re: First Point of Discussion

Post by David Dong Fri Sep 06, 2013 5:59 am

Chris_Ge#2013960364 wrote:When it comes to some barriers in our economic development or transformation, the first concern flashed upon my mind is,

--Mitigate excessive administrative interfere in market economy--

Although the past 30+ years reforming and opening has witnessed China’s great achievement in economic development, it seems that our political reforms lag behind and fail to keep pace with it.

Our market economy, deriving and changing from original planned economy, was born with some distinct Chinese characteristics, which is determined that our governmental functions played an important role at the beginning of economic development. And now, after developing and cumulating in recent decade of years, it has ability to generate natural force to guide the market capitalism through its own competitive mechanism. Government should pay more attention and spare more room to focus on macro- economic control, such as fiscal policy and monetary policy, acting as a qualified visible hand in this market.

Unfortunately, today we still find plenty of administrative regulations and provisions flood in our commercial field, even restricting some normal business behavior. It is supposed to become kind of bottleneck in our further economic development somehow. As a result, transformation of a public service-oriented government is absolutely indispensable.
(TBC)

Chris GE# GA 2013960364
I am afraid I don't agree with you, at least at this point.
Have you ever imagine if Chinese government release the interfere to the market?
I guess the economy will collapse, may most of us will lose our job, and then the society will be a piece of chaos...

David Dong

Posts : 31
Join date : 2013-09-02

Back to top Go down

First Point of Discussion  - Page 3 Empty Re: First Point of Discussion

Post by Chris_Ge#2013960364 Fri Sep 06, 2013 7:25 pm

David Dong wrote:
Chris_Ge#2013960364 wrote:When it comes to some barriers in our economic development or transformation, the first concern flashed upon my mind is,

--Mitigate excessive administrative interfere in market economy--

Although the past 30+ years reforming and opening has witnessed China’s great achievement in economic development, it seems that our political reforms lag behind and fail to keep pace with it.

Our market economy, deriving and changing from original planned economy, was born with some distinct Chinese characteristics, which is determined that our governmental functions played an important role at the beginning of economic development. And now, after developing and cumulating in recent decade of years, it has ability to generate natural force to guide the market capitalism through its own competitive mechanism. Government should pay more attention and spare more room to focus on macro- economic control, such as fiscal policy and monetary policy, acting as a qualified visible hand in this market.

Unfortunately, today we still find plenty of administrative regulations and provisions flood in our commercial field, even restricting some normal business behavior. It is supposed to become kind of bottleneck in our further economic development somehow. As a result, transformation of a public service-oriented government is absolutely indispensable.
(TBC)

Chris GE# GA 2013960364
I am afraid I don't agree with you, at least at this point.
Have you ever imagine if Chinese government release the interfere to the market?
I guess the economy will collapse, may most of us will lose our job, and then the society will be a piece of chaos...
Please notice that what I said is "ADMINISTRATIVE INTERFERE in market economy", which is not an identical conception of INTERFERE. This is just like to criticise the existence of Adam's apple from MAN to HUMAN...

Chris_Ge#2013960364

Posts : 3
Join date : 2013-09-05

Back to top Go down

First Point of Discussion  - Page 3 Empty Re: First Point of Discussion

Post by lucyzheng Fri Sep 06, 2013 7:51 pm

2013960417_Leo Li wrote:From company perspective,maybe more important thing is about the culture and the management style. Create a learning organization with inclusiveness and effective communication culture is the most critical element to win the competition in the 21st century, which can drive everybody within the organization to work creatively and enjoy the process. I'll try to write a summery from a single company perspective later when I'm free...

Cheers~


lucyzheng wrote:Following Dr. Ali's question, how to let China be more creative in current status?

Simply throw some personal views.

From country perspective,

1. Play a more active role involving international affairs.
2. Open policy to welcome more talents and type of business, eg. Trial of free trade zones.
...
From company perspective,
.....

LUCY ZHENG
2013GA
2013960118

Very cool. More professional than a professional HR:D Very Happy  I see many ideas in common sense and some are in different view. Let the ideas fly longer time.

Li chao, echo for your points, I will work with you to make a deeper discussion simply from how we can do creatively from a COMPANY perspective first...
lucyzheng
lucyzheng

Posts : 9
Join date : 2013-09-04
Location : SH

Back to top Go down

First Point of Discussion  - Page 3 Empty Re: First Point of Discussion

Post by Liu Xin Sun Sep 08, 2013 6:40 pm

I would like to discuss the topic "creativity" from a historical perspective, a nation's economics should be never separate from the fortune or destiny of a nation, in China's philosophy, "fell from the pinnacle of one's power" is a principle, no matter how powerful one country is, one day it will fall from its peak. China also follow this principle, China once hold 80% GDP of the world, it was the real center of the world no matter culture, economics, technology, etc. It was the peak time of China, but after 20th century, we disappeared from the stage of world.

Japan is one of the most creative countries in today's world I respect, especially when we take two phrases "Made in China" and "Made in Japan" to compare with each other, one will connect with cheap and low quality, but another will be more likely to associate with creativity and high technology.

But if we look back into history, China and Japan almost at the same time face the western developed countries' aggression, and at the same time to execute reform & open policy, Japan called MEIJI RESTORATION, China called WESTERNIZATION MOVEMENT, but result is Japan step into the developed countries group, China failed.

In my point of view, China was gradually recovering from Sino-Japanese War of 1894-1895, the total nation was too weak at that period of time, no matter military, nation's spirit, even the economics(that time China total economics size should 10 times as Japan, but civil war The Taiping Heavenly Kingdom movement consumed too much nation's energy), we see from the facts Japan rose from that battle and become stronger in economics and military and formally moves on the way of modernization.

But China, took almost 118 years to recover from that war, we tasted the bitter of war, we formally began to develop our economics after World war II, feeding 1/5 of world population, tried to complete 100% elementary education target, now we finish our goal, wish to come back to the center of world competing stage, we use "made in CHINA" to stand but still could not come back to stage center, we are lack of "Creativity", doesn't mean we are lack of intelligence, the only thing we need is just the time. China will copy the Japan model, first stage is low price, and afterwards, huge number of skilled workers and creative thinking people with great minds will prove this nation will bring this world a big big surprise. Of course, it is a long road with obstacles and challenge, but with time, creativity will just like rainbow after rain, showing to this world.

2013GA Liu Xin

Liu Xin

Posts : 1
Join date : 2013-09-08

Back to top Go down

First Point of Discussion  - Page 3 Empty Re: First Point of Discussion

Post by Alexis YANG(2013960273) Sun Sep 08, 2013 8:06 pm

After 2-day "intensive" studies and discoveries under prof.'s guide, I "pushed" also myself to think outside the box, in terms of barriers and challenges for China's further development depending on creativity.
As today's world turns out more and more to be a "village", what will be the stance of the other developped countries, especially western countries, who are currently much more "creative" as we learnd from much statistics during course? Will they let us develop and eventually support to improve the nation's creativity, or might probably set tricks or obstacles to prevent being caught up? I find it also important to take into account all these parameters/factors coming from outside of China.
Regards
2013GA YANG Xiaodong 2013960273

Alexis YANG(2013960273)

Posts : 5
Join date : 2013-09-04

Back to top Go down

First Point of Discussion  - Page 3 Empty Re: First Point of Discussion

Post by Vivian Yu Mon Sep 09, 2013 7:37 pm

Wow, it's so busy here! It seems I come a little bit late Razz Razz Razz 
Based on the hot topic the classmates discussing here, I would also like to share my opinions:
- China has been building up a well-off society, and Chinese residents are closed to living a comfortable life. Thus, people are starting to look for spiritual values, which speed up the creativity industries development.
- Creativity Industries – the key word is Creativity. Who can create? Talents! China is never lack of smart people, but the current education system is killing the innovation ability of our kids. Copy and repeat makes students losing the ability to think, to solve the problems and to create. Talents like oars, are driving the industry. So, I think Education is one of the challenges we are facing to.
- Business model is also one of the barriers. In the past years, more investment came to China because of the labor cost is much lower than Europe. So many Chinese companies are OEMs. They are just producing the products which are designed in other countries. “Made in China” became a sign. So if Chinese companies would like to change the situation, they have to change the business model, pay attention to concept innovation and design creativity.

Yu Luowei
13GA
2013968744


Last edited by Vivian Yu on Fri Sep 27, 2013 7:36 pm; edited 1 time in total

Vivian Yu

Posts : 5
Join date : 2013-09-05

Back to top Go down

First Point of Discussion  - Page 3 Empty Re: First Point of Discussion

Post by 2013960558 Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:40 am

two days of class concentration and tough Monday passed by, we would recover a little bit today, let's go on with the discussion as we gain lots of brainstorming on the class.

13GA Sam WANG Duqing

2013960558

Posts : 4
Join date : 2013-09-04

Back to top Go down

First Point of Discussion  - Page 3 Empty Re: First Point of Discussion

Post by gordon.guo Tue Sep 10, 2013 10:41 am

Firstly, I would like to say I strongly agree with this statement: Future economic development of China depends on its ability of develop its creative industries. Actually, this is a trend of developing for every country.

For China, there is no exception, it will face many challenges and barriers.
1. The Revolution of Education System.
The current education system is a machine, producing high-score student. Chinese students are well-known about its ability of doing the exam and homework. Compared with the foreign students, especially the ones from developed countries, Chinese students’ ability of imagination is very weak. When facing a problem, everyone is trying to find the ‘correct’ answer. Their minds are limited by their learning experience. In this case, it is very difficult to provide the creative idea after they graduate from the school.
Chinese government should take this problem seriously, and they have no time to waste if they really want to chase the developed countries. The change is supposed to be implemented from the kindergarten’s system. By doing this, it is possible to let the creative thinking become a good habit.
2. The improvement of the legal system.
We may realized that the current legal system still has many bugs. More than ten years ago, when we were enjoying the digital music from the computer, we were getting used to download it freely. As time goes by, when people realized that the copyright is needed to be respected and paid, people just can’t stop doing that. At that moment, we cannot find any suitable legal items to regulate this behavior. This is an example why I worried when we are developing creative industries.


Weiliang GUO 13GA 2013960376

gordon.guo

Posts : 2
Join date : 2013-09-10

Back to top Go down

First Point of Discussion  - Page 3 Empty Re: First Point of Discussion

Post by youthia Tue Sep 10, 2013 11:04 am

Create a learning organization with open, inclusiveness, cooperation will be the most important thing for the future economic development of China.

2013970395 Zhao youjia

2013960417_Leo Li wrote:From company perspective,maybe more important thing is about the culture and the management style. Create a learning organization with inclusiveness and effective communication culture is the most critical element to win the competition in the 21st century, which can drive everybody within the organization to work creatively and enjoy the process. I'll try to write a summery from a single company perspective later when I'm free...

Cheers~


lucyzheng wrote:Following Dr. Ali's question, how to let China be more creative in current status?

Simply throw some personal views.

From country perspective,

1. Play a more active role involving international affairs.
2. Open policy to welcome more talents and type of business, eg. Trial of free trade zones.
...
From company perspective,
1. Talent development: encourge internal transfer or buying talents from different industries, which may burst to more creative ideas and even transform an industry model.
2. Benchmark: My company Ford is reserved in some way of culture.Many systems are soley developed in its global oraganiztion in Ford's way rather than benchmarking most leading approach in the world. Making changes means consuming time, energy, traning resources, smart failure, etc. But more recently we see a combination of technology with Autos. SYNC, a technology we customers can use mobile to control and master your car is such a cool thing.

From personal persctive,
I look forward more discussion and knowledge exchange on and off class.

LUCY ZHENG
2013GA
2013960118

youthia

Posts : 4
Join date : 2013-09-04

Back to top Go down

First Point of Discussion  - Page 3 Empty Re: First Point of Discussion

Post by Chris_Ge#2013960364 Tue Sep 10, 2013 11:13 am

(Continuously)

--Improve efficiency and fairness on resources deployment by industrial restructuring--

Two topics related to our industries are boiling much violently among citizens or netizens: monopoly capacity and excess capacity.

It is true that minority of national state-own enterprises occupied some main industries in China though monopoly or oligopoly. Unquestionably such business mode deprives the rights or opportunities of foreign capital, private capital as well, to pursue high extra profit. Besides this unfairness, another disputed point is the efficiency of state own enterprises, which causes more inharmonious phenomenon compared with the rapid growth of our market economy.

While some resources are far away from efficient capitals, we also find a number of over-capacity industries come out to our horizon these years, spanning auto, steel, shipbuilding, textile, electronics and information, light industry etc.. Now authorities encourage to merger and acquisition in these sectors by establishing special fund to implement transformation or some new measurement such as energy conservation, emission cut, etc. Nevertheless, sunk cost is irrevocable and it just shows us the urgency of enhancing economic restructuring from this reverse perspective.

Chris GE# GA 2013960364

Chris_Ge#2013960364

Posts : 3
Join date : 2013-09-05

Back to top Go down

First Point of Discussion  - Page 3 Empty Re: First Point of Discussion

Post by vivianwang Tue Sep 10, 2013 5:08 pm

From my perspective, Chinese government plays a vital role in the development of creative industries.
On one hand, the education system must be changed first. Although we are in 21 century, the Chinese children and parents still have heavy pressure from the traditional examination. The children are encouraged to recite and try to remember the stupid formula, historical events and grammar, etc. I believe their brains which dominate the memory function maybe very strong. What about the creative part? The professor told us that use it or lose it. We are losing our creative brain. I felt sad when I wrote this part. I’m not sure when this Chinese dream can come true. However, let’s start from us, the young parents or the to-be parents. Let’s pay less attention to children’s exam score, but encourage them to play more, read more (not the text books) and take them to travel around with us. It’s another T shape contains two key elements for creativity, knowledge and experience. And when we expand our horizons, we’ll realize that life is a journey with many choices and surprises.

On the other hand, the government should establish the policies and legal terms to protect IP rights.
I noticed that my fellows had discussed a lot here. I just want to add one point that law is the bottom line of IP right protection but the cost is very high. The creative company may not survive even though it wins the lawsuit. Therefore, we’d better set up a special institution to help the company find the evidence and supporting.

Vivian wang 2013970254

vivianwang

Posts : 1
Join date : 2013-09-04

Back to top Go down

First Point of Discussion  - Page 3 Empty Re: First Point of Discussion

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 2 of 4 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum